Although I liked this film in 3D, I wonder why I pay much more for a film extra. My friend and I bought my ticket Jackass and in the end only twenty pay $ for tickets. So why cinemas accumulated price of a movie in 3D? Without doubt, the computer projector to a 3D movie is not that expensive. Well, I did a little research and discovered that it is certainly not the cost for the equipment project behind rising prices. Roger Ebert in Newsweek, says there are a lot of money to be made when the films in 3D. Consider this purchase as a theater play projector 3D films in 3D. Yes, this is the new projector is expensive, so the theater free of charge to say a few dollars more to offset the cost, but that the theater that uses the same projector, to show films in 2D. To put this in perspective, we will pay a six fifty-five dollars more for the same movie but with some additional pieces of the animation class. Cinemas try to rationalize the expenditure under the guise of a projector expensive, but if that were true, then why are they expensive to their normal price of a movie projector in the same 2D. Many critics call the ideas for Hollywood films and are only using 3D as a way to make money. The question is whether people really like the 3D movies to pay too much for them, or are they a fad that will soon be forgotten?
There are memorable films such as The Green Man and his donkey, he has an incredible amount of money the first time. Shrek is now profitable on the road on the way to 3D animation. Shrek the latest After Forever has not met the expectations of the fourth edition. It was only U.S. $ 71,300,000, while the third Shrek has a huge U.S. $ 122,000,000 opening weekend and the fourth Shrek had the advantage of tickets for 3D movies. Then there are people who were of Shrek or the way the film they are boring. Personally, I like the option to choose if I want to watch a movie in 3D or 2D. I do not think it's fair to pay more for a film that does not cost much more than a 2-D movie for free. Have also studied the effects of 3D animation. Many people have headaches or prolonged exposure to digital 3D-associated eye. The doctors say that 3D is a very unknown visual experience that makes the work more difficult to translate the brain, resulting in a simple and headache. There are also many people with eye diseases minors under natural circumstances, not a big problem, but to see what creates a film of unusual visual 3-D eye more problems. Consumer Reports that 15 percent of respondents viewing experience eyestrain and headaches of a 3D movie. I personally experienced only a little, and before I thought it was a survey they give you to use glasses. If I get headaches on my glasses and take the watch movie, they started for a while without feeling. The problem is then that I do not see the movie at all, because they are so that you are designed to wear glasses, unlike the first film "Spy Kids 3D.
Other critics say that 3D is good, but it must be taken to a whole new level. Currently, there are theaters in Asia, with projections 6D. 6D while watching a movie, the viewer can feel, touch / ride movements and interaction with the film. Weather on your 3D or 6D, I do not think a movie should be available in a version. There are some great movies in 3D around like Jackass. I think the idea of a film 6D also be ordered for certain films. But not all films should be done in 3D or 6D, too. Hollywood maybe you should try a good old 2-D film with amazing actors unforgettable story, but I think it's now hard to find.
